As Secure as a Hardware Wallet. As Simple as a Banking App.

MPC splits a single private key into distributed shares that never fully combine at any point, while multi-sig uses multiple complete, independent keys requiring M-of-N signatures to authorize a transaction. MPC is typically faster and cheaper on-chain since it produces a standard single signature, while multi-sig is more battle-tested, transparent on-chain, and easier for users to audit independently.

Yes, our Wallet SDK is specifically designed for embedding into existing products without requiring a full standalone wallet rebuild. Most integrations can add core send/receive/sign functionality within a matter of weeks, with more advanced features like account abstraction layered in afterward as needed.

We design social recovery and guardian-based recovery flows using account abstraction, meaningfully reducing reliance on users safely storing a seed phrase alone with no backup. This typically involves trusted contacts or devices that can collectively help a user regain access without any single point holding full control.

We build multi-chain wallets spanning all major EVM chains, Solana, and Bitcoin within a single unified interface, with automatic network detection so users interact with assets without needing to understand the underlying chain architecture themselves.

It depends on your regulatory exposure, target users, and product model — custodial wallets simplify UX and enable features like account recovery via support, but they concentrate custody risk and regulatory obligations on your platform. We help assess this trade-off explicitly rather than defaulting to one model.

Independent security review specifically targets key generation, storage, and signing logic, alongside penetration testing of recovery flows for the everyday failure modes — lost devices, social engineering attempts, and phishing-style signing requests — that account for the majority of real-world wallet fund loss.